Sergey Nivens/

Emotion or reason: amygdala or frontal cortex?

Nobody reading the news can fail to notice the stresses being imposed upon rational thinking. On the day that the American Republican Convention concludes, a torrent of articles spews forth from the assembled journalists, of which this excellent piece in Salon is one of the better ones. All are variations pretty much on a single theme: if there is a collective modern mind, are we losing it?

The Salon piece references a second article, described as “truly terrifying” beyond what is also an electric and highly quotable stream of articulate acuity by British journalist Laurie Penny in The Guardian. In reporting another journalist breaking down in tears and exclaiming: “ . . . there’s so much hate . . . What is happening to this country,” Penny’s diagnosis, and one of her better lines among the many good ones, is that what we have is the natural result when “weaponised insincerity is applied to structured ignorance”.

Penny’s context is the brittle cynicism of the heartless Twittersphere, and the manipulation of the fearful, angry and dispossessed by people who must know better but don’t care. Her immediate context is the highly charged atmosphere of an American convention bear pit, never the most salubrious reflection of humanity in its cognitive finery. But she could as well have referenced the bluff demagogueries of politicians the world over, all contemptibly cashing in on terror, ignorance and want in the service of their grubby whimsies and self-imagined entitlements.

We must be wary of assuming too much, too far, and too soon about a future of SuperIntelligence or, more ludicrously, the dawning of a new age of convergent intelligence where the power of the human brain is augmented by so-called Artificial General Intelligence. Given the power of reason rendered truly Super by a necessarily reflective consciousness, we might expect any AGI worth its salt to ask of us:

With which human intelligence do you propose that we converge? Are we to be amazed at the brute twitchings of the human amygdala, driven by its primal urges and perpetually lurking tigers? Or is the frontal cortex that lifted you clear of the swamp of all those base appetites, now capable at last of getting at higher truths without deception? If neuroscience is understanding more about the reflective effects of aggression on the brain, can we relay this knowledge to the twitter trolls, the market grifters, and all those venal politicians?

Lively Stuff from Planet BAM!

  • Designs on the future: AI actually raises the stakes

    This article focuses on the world of graphic and structural design, but applies also to anyone whose future intersects meaningfully with where artificial intelligence is taking us. A gap will open up between the majority who see AI in simple binary terms – either facilitating life as we know it, or rendering us all redundant – and those who understand that the integration of new machine intelligence with human psychology and biology represents a deep opportunity to up our cognitive game. This article scratches the surface: but what a surface . . .

  • Do the best algorithms merely intensify the effects of echo-chamber publishing?

    This Aeon essay reflects on “algorithmic fetishism” and the functional stresses and moral strains that are imposed on an information culture increasingly dominated by “intelligent” search and curation. What sort of leap is it from “reading” consumer behaviours in the past and present, to predictive analytics on what people will be thinking in the future? And when people in power don’t like what those algorithms have to say, what happens next?

  • Being a whizz at stats analysis is not the same as common sense

    This report on the Winograd Schema Challenge, in which machines are programmed to unpick the ambiguities of human language, suggests that the inferential capabilities of even young children far exceed what any chatbots so far conceived can manage. Even if the day comes when a chatbot can be programmed for any and all eventualities in any and all situations, what we will end up with is no more than humongous brute computing. “Intelligence” lies somewhere beyond all that.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *