We invariably use the expression “Follow the Money” when we are trying to understand the workings of corruption or malfeasance, or simply trying to understand how dreams and motivations are transmuted into outcomes. It will surely be a mark of the evolution of old thinking that looks back, and into a world of new thinking that looks forward, that we will grasp our understanding of how humanity’s interest in money will influence future behaviours, and so can plan for more distant horizons.
In the immediate aftermath of the death of Marvin Minsky, there has been more reflecting on the convergence of thinking machines with “meat machines” (that’s us) and how this is going to excite a number of miracles, including the already recognised phenomenon of extended longevity. The now comfortably received wisdom is that people are living longer, and will live even longer in the future.
The first question always to be put to received wisdom is “Really?” Are we all living longer, or is it just that the ones who are living longer are living much, much longer? Meanwhile, our carcinogenic world is cutting a swathe through all those youthful under-80s, and how many over-80s do we notice among the population of the obese?
The second question is about the money. If today’s average lifespan doubled from 80 to 160, two implications arising from the world we inhabit now is that people’s span of eligibility for pensions and the number of years of greatest risk of getting Alzheimer’s disease will each increase from the current 15 to the unimaginably expensive 95 – a factor of more than 6. Good luck with finding the money for that.
Lively Stuff from Planet BAM!
- American university students are “struggling to get past ‘master’”
Beyond stupid, prompting wonder at the possibility that we might get smarter without also getting smarter about how we use language. Will they worry about bus drivers/slave drivers?
- Internet of Emotions may or may not be a “thing” but it poses some interesting questions
Careless beyond its early confusion of infer/imply, with several big assumptions to be filtered out or smiled at; for example, a sentence about data ownership and revenue that begins with “When intellectual property issues are clear . . .”. But there are also several useful links in the piece: read this on “algorithmic angels” to protect us from “obtrusive personalisation”.
- Deeper thinking on AI-savvy robots in a post-Luddite, post-scarcity, economic New Order
More stimulating than most journalistic ruminations on robots taking our jobs, this piece from PCMag starts with an inspiring report of AI successfully engaged in a research lab, and moves on to ask if education can evolve to meet the challenges of a world beyond full employment.